Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter whether professional workers like doctors, nurses, and teachers should be paid higher than sports and entertainment personalities? This has elicited a stimulated disputation among the public. Whereas one group of people says that they should be paid higher than the sports and entertainment personalities, I sanguinely believe that they should not. This essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, There are myriads of reasons to support this notion but one of the most compelling reasons is that doctors, nurses, and doctors should be affordable for the general public. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that students who performed more practical where better than the one who only worked on theory. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both theoretical and practical knowledge apparently can be seen.
On the contrary, there are skeptics who conjecture that universities should provide the theoretical knowledge as it is very important that a student understand the basics. Although it seems ostensibly veridical this is not correct, as the theoretical knowledge is provided along with the practical knowledge.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both the sides, I profoundly believe that the Doctors, nurses, and teachers should be affordable for everyone. Not only do the advantage of their low fee prove the significance for the society, but also pinpoint implications of their expensive service.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...nd doctors should be affordable for the general public. According to my own experience, when I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, so, then, thus, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 31.9359605911 66% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50775193798 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01810583027 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573643410853 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6547500949 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.181818182 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15973437689 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600586168034 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469149935857 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100877441668 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505906943905 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.