Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter, whether library books are useless. Whereas some people say that paper books are not useful anymore, I sanguinely believe that they are. This essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that paper books from the library are not harmful to eyes like the e-books are. In my own experience, during my college time, I conducted research, which revealed that students who used the e-books started reporting eyes problem. Thus, the beneficial ramification of using printed books apparently can be seen.
On the contrary, skeptics conjecture that as e-books provide mobility, and will soon overtake the paper books. Although it seems ostensibly veridical, this is a one-sided view. College research done recently shows that most students still prefer visiting the library for books. Hence, it is correct to presume it the preconceived notion.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both the sides, I profoundly believe that printed books far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantage of using Library books prove its significance, but also pinpoints the implication of using e-books.
- Some say that music, art and drama are as important as other school subjects,especially at the primary level.Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world. Ordinary people can get no advantage with the development of air travel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- People can perform everyday tasks, such as shopping and banking as well as business transaction, without meeting other people face to face. what are the effects on induvidual and society as a whole? 55
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 70
- the environment we live in is at stake due to a range of problems. What are the underlying causes? Who is responsible to combat this? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a logical conclusion. At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, still, then, thus, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 31.9359605911 66% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1154.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 219.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26940639269 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61267829307 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 139.433497537 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630136986301 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7339707655 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1666666667 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142686053702 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05179028751 0.0925447433944 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367793110707 0.071462118173 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882181174758 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281038583778 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 12.6369458128 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.