Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter, whether shooting incidence has increased because many people have guns at home. Whereas some people do not agree with this statement, I sanguinely believe that its true. This essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, There are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that availability of the weapon with the people. According to my own experience, when I was a university student I conducted research, which revealed that people who own the weapon tend to use it if they get into any fight. Thus, The ramification of keeping a gun at home can be seen.
On the contrary, skeptics conjecture that availability of the guns at home does not increase the shooting incidents, Its depend on the environment. Although it seems ostensibly veridical, this is the one-sided story. Research conducted by a reputed agency disclosed that people who keep the guns tend to use them. Hence, It can be considered a preconceived notion.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both the sides, I profoundly believe that the disadvantages of using guns far outweigh its benefits. Not only the disadvantage of using guns prove its significance, but also pinpoints the implications of using it.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, then, thus, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1179.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 233.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06008583691 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87805283531 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609442060086 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3461519502 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.25 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4166666667 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.25397266985 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188065275361 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674339448746 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657131549113 0.071462118173 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111055385138 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654572404017 0.0609392437508 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.