Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter whether E-books has diminished the value of the printed book, this has elicited a heating debate among the public. Whereas a substantial number of individual disagree with the fact that e-books have overtaken the printed books, I sanguinely believe that E-books have set a new trend. This essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, There are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that E-books comes as a PDF file, which enables a user to access the book on any device. Furthermore, this provides mobility and convenience to the readers, as they can read the book any time.
On the contrary, some skeptics conjecture that, as the e-books can only be read using the electronic devices, they will have side effects in long run. Although It seems ostensibly veridical, this is not true. As nowadays we have special devices available in the market which are not harmful to the eyes.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both of the sides I profoundly believe that the benefits of using e-books far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of using E-books prove its significance, but also pinpoints printed books implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 251, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'disagree that'.
Suggestion: disagree that
...reas a substantial number of individual disagree with the fact that e-books have overtaken the printed book...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ostensibly veridical, this is not true. As nowadays we have special devices availa...
^^
Line 7, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of using E-books prove its significance, but also pinpoints printed books implica...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, then, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1146.0 1207.87684729 95% => OK
No of words: 229.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00436681223 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63870387639 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606986899563 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3167356363 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.6 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160352972957 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632719496568 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425187418476 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963087672478 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224523709181 0.0609392437508 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.