Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter, whether library books are useless. Whereas some people say that paper books are not useful anymore, I sanguinely believe that they are. This essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that paper books are not harmful to eyes like the digital books. In my own experience, during my college time, I conducted research, which revealed that students who used the digital books started reporting eyes problem. Thus, the beneficial ramification of using paper books apparently can be seen.
On the contrary, skeptics conjecture that as digital books provide mobility, they will soon overtake the paper books. Although it seems ostensibly veridical, this is a one-sided view. College research done recently shows that most students still prefer visiting the library for paper books. Hence, it is correct to presume it the preconceived notion.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both the sides, I profoundly believe that library books far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantage of using paper books prove its significance, but also pinpoints the implication of using PDF books.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a logical conclusion. At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, still, then, thus, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 31.9359605911 63% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 220.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58720229253 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622727272727 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.863287233 50.4703680194 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.25 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108173742271 0.242375264174 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411862134803 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.029264953478 0.071462118173 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0698743404303 0.151781067708 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159120875983 0.0609392437508 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 12.6369458128 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.