Government should reduce their investments in arts, music, and painting. Do you agree or disagree?
Government should reduce their investment in arts, music, and painting has created chaos currently. Some people are in against of the stance while some are in favor of the topic. However, I firmly believe that the government should invest in preserving these items because these are the identity of the country as well as the history. This essay will further deliver both sides of stance before jumping to the conclusion.
To begin with the positive side, there are myriad benefits of preserving the past history but the most conspicuous one is, it is considered as the culture, tradition, and as an asset of the nation. Moreover, by preserving this would give chance people to show their talent, as well as they, can take it to the next level. Thus, this would be the platform for the young generation to showcase their skills and became the medium of income.
However, there is also negative co-exist with the above positive points. Firstly, preserving the history would incur the unnecessary extra cost and by which government would never focus on the current trend of the country. Going ahead, by investing in the public sector proportionally, there will be a hike in a bunch of opportunities for the people of the motherland and by which there is an overall hike in the development rate.
In the view of the above arguments, one can reach to the conclusion that despite spending the astronomical amount in the preservation of the history, the government should use fair amount so that it can generate the maximum return.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tance before jumping to the conclusion. To begin with the positive side, there a...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t it can generate the maximum return.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1282.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94980694981 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65470339165 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548262548263 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 401.4 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4254685441 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.545454545 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172094144983 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696783522412 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122303352468 0.071462118173 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975932671878 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866810688167 0.0609392437508 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.