Governments should reduce their investments in arts, music and painting. Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Governments should reduce their investments in arts, music and painting. Do you agree or disagree?

One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the people believing that governments should reduce their investments in arts, music and painting. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one's life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.

There is a numerous arguments in favor of my stance. Most preponderant one is that the Investment in art, music and painting can not only helps to grow the new career options for younger generation, but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives. Needless to say, all these merits stand one good in stead, as far as augmenting the chances of their prosperity and excellence are concerned.

There are, however, some pitfalls that can easily overwhelm the potential benefits of these investments made by the government on arts, music and painting. The primary one stems from the fact that by observing the aforementioned trend, people have not only realized its gravity, but also gauged the magnitude of its repercussions when it comes to today's ever-changing lifestyle. Besides, its impact on these investments is far-reaching indeed. Hence, it is apparent that why many are against these investments.

In the view of arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite some drawbacks the benefits of these investments are indeed too great to ignore.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ll only lead to a myriad of concerns in ones life. However, I do not entirely accept...
^^^^
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'argument'?
Suggestion: argument
...y in this essay. There is a numerous arguments in favor of my stance. Most preponderan...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'can' requires base form of the verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
...in art, music and painting can not only helps to grow the new career options for youn...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0074906367 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79621565301 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554307116105 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1158666416 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.416666667 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.25397266985 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19994316292 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725993995579 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109595419853 0.071462118173 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119063017106 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0820152827053 0.0609392437508 135% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.