If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose?
Recently, the phenomenon of climate change and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of changing in weather patterns is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly by both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that global warming can be a plus, and I will analyze that through this essay.
From a social standpoint, changing the weather pattern can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the greenhouse gases, as well as the destruction of the ozone layer, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered rising the atmosphere temperature. Thus, beneficial ramifications by both emission of toxic gases and rising sea level can be seen.
Within the realm of threatening the marine eco-system, climate changes might increase the consequences of a wide variety of incurable disease. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the industrialization relate to this reality that the demerits fossil fuels of pertain to urbanization. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of melting ice cabs correlated negatively with rising the atmosphere temperature. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of widespread use of public transport systems.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of halting the climate change far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of imposing stricter legislation prove the significance of using public transport systems, but also pinpoint penalties to the offenders’ implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'demerits'' or 'demerit's'?
Suggestion: demerits'; demerit's
...ization relate to this reality that the demerits fossil fuels of pertain to urbanization...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es to the offenders' implications.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64748201439 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28550210667 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651079136691 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.202937466 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.833333333 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0480886504336 0.242375264174 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0162395958201 0.0925447433944 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0165712184036 0.071462118173 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0272387060261 0.151781067708 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00869643345861 0.0609392437508 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.03 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.