If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose?
Recently, the phenomenon of climate change studies and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of specific climate surveys is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that tropical climate research can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the study of particular climate can provide the society with some noticeable effects which rooted in the fact that the merits of a sustainable solution, as well as climate pattern recognition, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered particular advantages of local climate change study. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both rainy forests choose and the modern measurement methods apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, climate change considerable results might increase the consequence of air pollution. Moreover, fundamental aspects of global warming would relate to this reality that the demerits of the Carbon dioxide emission pertain to rising atmospheric temperature. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of deforestation is correlated negatively with sustainable sources. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the Equator local rural water waste.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of climate change survey on different areas like tropical forests far weigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of reducing nonrenewable energy sources consumption prove the clean environment, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76344086022 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17353507625 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 139.433497537 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659498207885 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.255940504 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157078926415 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463082571904 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424525476373 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0821169753421 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484747853285 0.0609392437508 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.12 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.