The environment we are living in is a danger due to various problems. Who do you think should be responsible to solve it? Governments, organizations or each individual?
Recently, the phenomenon of endanger environment and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the ecological taking care is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that responsibility about failure can be plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the ecological environment responsibility can provide the society with some noticeable effects with rooted in the fact that the merits of altruism behavior, as well as, pleasant nature, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the high-profile advantages of governmental consideration on environmental problems. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both friendly manner with nature and concerned action with Mother nature apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, various problems of environment might increase the consequence of climate change. Moreover, fundamental aspects of individual problems would relate to this reality that the demerits of water source’s pollution pertain to damaged plant. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of individual harmful affair is correlate negatively with healthy environment. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of neglected conservation rules.
T conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of responsibility about living environment problems far weigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of sustainable solution prove the significance of natural sources, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9594095941 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38997325698 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675276752768 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6240468308 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.583333333 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119405591023 0.242375264174 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0378414180493 0.0925447433944 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0262608922936 0.071462118173 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0663353738754 0.151781067708 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0140122013966 0.0609392437508 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.58 11.5310837438 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.14 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.