The environment we are living in is a danger due to various problems. Who do you think should be responsible to solve it? Governments, organizations or each individual?
Recently, the phenomenon of endanger environment and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of ecological thinking is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that responsibility of life can be plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the ecological responsibility can provide the society with some noticeable effects with rooted in the fact that the merits of altruism behavior, as well as, good relationship with nature, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the high-profile advantages of governmental consideration on environmental problems. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both fairly manner and concerned acting about nature apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, various problems of nature might increase the consequence of climate change. Moreover, fundamental aspects of individual problems would relate to this reality that the demerits of pollution of water sources pertain to damaged plant. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of individual affair is correlate negatively with healthy environment. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of neglected conservation rules.
T conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of responsibility about living environment problems far weigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of sustainable solution prove the significance of natural sources, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88764044944 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38761508718 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677902621723 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.78656705 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11744999092 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0356329062089 0.0925447433944 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0218716136618 0.071462118173 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.064732703582 0.151781067708 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190068539215 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.23 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.