If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose?
Recently, the phenomenon of climate change in the North Pole and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of changing in weather patterns is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly by both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that global warming can be a plus, and I will analyze that through this essay.
From a social standpoint, changing the weather pattern can provide both poles with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the greenhouse gases, as well as the destruction of the ozone layer, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influences of acid rain on the North pole environment. Thus, beneficial ramifications by both emission of toxic gases and rising the atmosphere temperature can be seen.
Within the realm of threatening the marine eco-system, climate changes might increase the consequences of a wide variety of incurable disease. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the industrialization relate to this reality that the demerits of fossil fuels pertain to the urbanization. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of melting ice cabs correlated negatively with rising the sea level. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the endangered animals.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of halting the climate change in the North Pole far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of imposing stricter legislation prove the significance of using public transport systems, but also pinpoint penalties to the offenders’ implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... in the fact that the greenhouse gases, as well as the destruction of the ozone layer, are...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es to the offenders' implications.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51890034364 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23871083662 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639175257732 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4337052998 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.833333333 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0469170636746 0.242375264174 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0155446161928 0.0925447433944 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0158252868326 0.071462118173 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0266092882979 0.151781067708 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00815770380097 0.0609392437508 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 55.0591133005 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.