Imitating celebrities in sports and movies good or bad? do you agree?
Recently, the phenomenon of imitating celebrities and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the significance of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to blieve that imitating ceromonies can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, social behavior can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in fact that crucial effect, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramification of both sports events and movies celebrities apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, imitation might increase the consequences this improving social skills. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with academic ceromonies. hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of social effects.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe the benefits of positive imitation far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of movies festivals prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
...ed negatively with academic ceromonies. hence, it is correct to presume the preconcei...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81497797357 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2595844579 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.696035242291 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7815902324 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136642330599 0.242375264174 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476094587486 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548639414197 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0717227027766 0.151781067708 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269870929602 0.0609392437508 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.17 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.