with the increase of digital media available online the role of the library has become obsolete and universities should only procure digital materials rather than constantly textbook.
It has long been a subject of discussion whether with the increase of digital media available online the role of the library has become obsolete and universities should only procure digital materials rather than constantly textbook or not. In my opinion, the former notion has several elements that deserve attention and I will explain why using pertinent arguments.
There myriad of arguments in favor of my context, and the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that people extra careful with their decisions. For example, according to a recent survey done by Stanford University, 45% people benefit from the above mentioned notion, whereas 30% people face disadvantages due to it. Hence it is apparent why many citizens are in favor of the above stance.
Another argument in support of my view is that governments worldwide have become more active in dealing with this situation. To illustrate, as per recent academic research carried out by the Australian government, 60% citizens gained immensely from the proposed government reforms. They improved their existing scenario tremendously and that paved the way for a better economic future. Therefore, not only will this make people more careful and pragmatic in their approach, but also will it lead to a better living standard.
From what has been discussed above, it is clear that the benefits of the given topic significantly outweigh the drawbacks. Lastly, in my opinion it would be wise to say with increase of digital media available online, the role of library has become obsolete and universities should only procure digital materials rather than constantly textbook.
- study history and study science and mathematics 72
- investment in arts music and painting 80
- Do you agree or disagree, whether parents are held responsible for their children's action? 11
- some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. which opinion do you agree with?discuss both options and give example? 72
- Networking of public transportation available for eveyone 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 316, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...0% people face disadvantages due to it. Hence it is apparent why many citizens are in...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, lastly, so, therefore, whereas, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26436781609 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73388226547 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605363984674 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7088750482 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.909090909 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431371505751 0.242375264174 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14913137717 0.0925447433944 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.291031415598 0.071462118173 407% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30389927389 0.151781067708 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.277165092723 0.0609392437508 455% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.