involvement_of_employees_in_decision_making. do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, involving employees in the decision-making process has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, which leads to a moot question “whether using employees in the decision making process is reasonable or not?”. It is a widely view that using employees as a member of the company to make a decision is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must weigh up the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief that involving employees in the decisions of the company plays a vital role in the world of business. Therefore, I express several reasons to support this idea. First and foremost is the revenue of the company will be boosted and the quality is improved. Secondly, it is quite clear that the brand of the enterprise will be protected as well as the relationship between clients and employees will be enriched. In addition to this information, a group of the sociologist, working at a prestigious university conducted that by involving employees in making a decision the sense of cooperation, creativity, responsibility, job satisfaction, and loyalty are promoted. Also, the popularity of the company by the productive plan of the employee will be increased and the employees will enjoy having the lucrative job.
However, undoubtedly involving employees in the decision-making process provides people with various negative points. It should be taken into account that the company may face the financial implications, such as embezzlement. Moreover, the secret information of the company might be spread.
To recapitulate, I entirely agree that employees must be involved in the decision-making process in the company. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... the decision-making process has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('widely') instead an adjective, or a noun ('view') instead of another adjective.
...cess is reasonable or not?'. It is a widely view that using employees as a member of the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, in addition, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34006734007 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24297487379 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.0 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5071474003 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.25397266985 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23213124287 0.242375264174 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880365356503 0.0925447433944 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875758355222 0.071462118173 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147361961442 0.151781067708 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275304291886 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.94827586207 181% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.