It is important for children to study a film at school to learn literature. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Recently, a phenomenon of school kids study a movie to learn literature and its impacts sparked heated debate drawing the undivided attention of the public. Although contested by many that keeping a movie as a source of learning literature is highly beneficial, such issues might be regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that watching a film for learning literature can be a plus and I will analyze it throughout this essay.
First and foremost, movies are filmed carefully by a great number of professional technicians and the content will go under profuse reviews. Post reviews, the best outcome will be revealed to the public with a great content in it. If students carefully gone through this movie, it could offer them a lot and can become a great source of literature. For instance, a study conducted by the University of Melbourne revealed that over 80% of students are honing their skills by watching classic and contemporary movies.
While some people posit that watching films is a waste of time but they are not aware that kids watches movies in a different way than adults. They primarily focuses on learning new things everyday including from the scenes of a moving image. This distinct vision will boost their career as films offer them different flavours of knowledge including great quantity of literature. From my own experience, my 2 year old daughter started speaking fluent English just by watching animation films on YouTube and it stunned me to see such oral fluency from her before even going to the school.
To conclude, while there are serveral compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of studying movies to learn literature far outweigh its drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... are not aware that kids watches movies in a different way than adults. They primarily focuses on ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'They' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'focus'
Suggestion: focus
...fferent way than adults. They primarily focuses on learning new things everyday includi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...rimarily focuses on learning new things everyday including from the scenes of a moving i...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09830508475 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78130583828 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5731693573 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.333333333 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 7.25397266985 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162592467845 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593274524643 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322961471468 0.071462118173 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0933666572292 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251402770805 0.0609392437508 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.