The importance of preserving old architectural buildings although it require huge cost, was always debatable, has now become controversial. It is agreed strongly upon the fact that this has some convincing arguments despite the contentions about it. This essay will discuss how old architectural design added value to nations cultural aspects and how preserving these buildings are harm to citizens of that nation and thus will lead to a reasoned conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why protecting old buildings has some negative aspects to citizens living in that nation, but the most alarming one lies in the fact that these building are not safe as they are ancient and in order to renovate then and make the safety precautions it require huge money investment and this will impact on nations economy also. For an instance, an research on some old buildings around london streets proved that 85% of them have safety issues due to the old architectural structures. Foe this reason, the adverse effect of preserving ancient architectural buildings could not be ignored.
Nevertheless, most of the people believe preserving old buildings has some positive facets as well. However, most predominant one lies in the fact that these buildings are valuable to nations as they holds cultural values, which is not beneficial but necessary. As an illustration, shows that in India people worship some old architectural buildings as their gods and they don’t think twice spending money on maintaining these buildings. Therefore, the importance of preserving old buildings despite the cost is undeniable.
After analyzing the above discussion, it can be concluded that preserving ancient buildings is significant, although the cost of maintaining them and these buildings are not safe should not be overlooked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'requires'?
Suggestion: requires
...old architectural buildings although it require huge cost, was always debatable, has n...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lthough it require huge cost, was always debatable, has now become controversial....
^^
Line 2, column 294, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'requires'?
Suggestion: requires
...then and make the safety precautions it require huge money investment and this will imp...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 348, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...oney investment and this will impact on nations economy also. For an instance, an resea...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 364, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...and this will impact on nations economy also. For an instance, an research on some o...
^^^^
Line 2, column 387, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... nations economy also. For an instance, an research on some old buildings around l...
^^
Line 2, column 387, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
... nations economy also. For an instance, an research on some old buildings around london str...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'hold'
Suggestion: hold
...ildings are valuable to nations as they holds cultural values, which is not beneficia...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36236933798 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95761969068 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515679442509 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 469.8 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.7860189029 50.4703680194 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.909090909 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.33497536946 150% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147980017831 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072684833629 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406721037722 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108009982048 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191563435169 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.