It is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past even if it will be expensive to do so. What’s your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of preserving old monuments and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that it is an indispensable to preserve old buildings and it is highly beneficial for the nation, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the effectiveness of old monuments can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, saving old beautiful buildings like mansions, coffee house and museum can provide nation with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of keeping culture and tradition alive for next generation, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment on historical buildings which discovered the influence of old architectural monuments in enhancing knowledge about past. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both keeping memories alive of our ancestors and gaining knowledge about history apparently can be seen.
From a realm of business department, maintaining old architectural buildings might increase the consequences of more business deals. Moreover, fundamental aspects of old monuments could relate to this reality that the merits of preservation historical buildings pertain to rise in revenue for business like coffee house and restaurants. As a tangible example, some academic research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the upside of old buildings is correlated positively with significant increase in nation’s beauty. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of preserving old beautiful building far outweigh its drawback. However, government should be prudent enough to have fruitful outcomes of this phenomenon.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1207.87684729 142% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75503355705 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27099284185 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590604026846 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 379.143842365 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5187771273 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.916666667 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.25397266985 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138800531491 0.242375264174 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505854970522 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0238720971458 0.071462118173 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0887532503147 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0138352594695 0.0609392437508 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.