Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the question of whether a law can change human manner has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of mandated rules is highly rewarding, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I profoundly inclined to believe that compulsory rules can change human attitude. This essay will analyze this idea by providing some academic evidence before concluding.
On the one hand, from the policymakers' standpoint, fines and imprisonment can provide the society with some noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that preventative role of punishment, as well as separating offenders from normal people, are essentially bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a college student, I conducted an academic research which discovered the psychological influence of prosecuting criminals. Thus, the beneficial ramification of both convictions and educational effects of the law on human-being could be observed.
On the other hand, within the realm of regulating a community, legal conducts may increase the consequence of human moral evolution. Moreover, fundamental aspects of law effects on men and women relate to this reality that the demerits of execution and capital punishment pertain to rehabilitation. As a tangible example, a scientific research conducted by Tehran University in 2016 has asserted that the downside of ruling city dwellers is correlated negatively with lenient city's governing. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of behavioral changes by law.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I highly believe that the conducive impacts of enforcement far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only does law affect the way a person behaves, but also moralize and determine good deed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
Recently, the question of whether a law can change human manner has spark...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 27, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'policymakers'' or 'policymaker's'?
Suggestion: policymakers'; policymaker's
...oncluding. On the one hand, from the policymakers standpoint, fines and imprisonment can ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54513888889 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15897999524 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 139.433497537 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663194444444 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2636499511 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.846153846 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194927359249 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725157732345 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088181520029 0.071462118173 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101699567494 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571203015452 0.0609392437508 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.98 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 55.0591133005 207% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.