Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not?
Nowadays, the influence of law on person’s behavior has become a long-running dispute among the public all over that world, which leads to moot question “whether a law can change human behavior or not?”. It is a widely held view that obtaining proper legislation is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must weigh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief that adjusting accurate laws plays a vital role in the behavior of each society. Therefore, I express several reasons why I support this idea. First and foremost is that the crime rate and the motivation of committing the offense will be diminished. Secondly, the prevalence crimes, such as embezzlement, theft, corruption that cause damaging consequences decrease in the communities. In addition to this information, the majority of laws are efficient, including the traffic light and fastening seatbelt that guarantee the people’s lives. A very tangible example to illustrate would be Thailand that smuggling the drugs is excessively prevalent, while the government could control it by tougher law.
However, undoubtedly law enforcement provides people with various negative points. It should be taken into account that the fear will be developed in the society due to the death penalty or prolonged captivations. Moreover, the criminals will be encouraged to revenge after prison and the violence and aggressive behavior might be raised. For instance, South Korea's nation has been deprived of their civil rights because of unreasonable laws.
To recapitulate, I entirely agree that obtaining laws in order to change people’s manner must be taken into consideration. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...aw on person's behavior has become a long-running dispute among the public all over that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47945205479 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.093093354 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66095890411 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0893795274 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.285714286 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.25397266985 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200664519598 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052937330026 0.0925447433944 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761782684618 0.071462118173 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112164429784 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601682725481 0.0609392437508 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.