Recently the phenomenon of learning another language at early ages and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of speaking a new language in childhood is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded highly thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that start learning a foreign language at early ages can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, being a bilingual kid can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that child's brain's skill development as well as improving communication skills, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered bilingual or multilingual children have more skills in learning and communication. Thus, the beneficial consequences of brain growth and ability improvement apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of education, learning a foreign language at primary school might increase the consequences of being open up to the changes. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of being monolingual speaker related to this reality that the demerits of being less likely to other's culture or lifestyle pertain to speaking just in a native language. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of being monolingual is correlated negatively with being isolated and prejudice. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of learning another language in childhood facilitate to learn different cultures in adulthood.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of being multilingual at early ages far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of being multilingual prove the significance of development, but also avoid biased behavior implication.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: PROVE_PROOF[2]
Message: Did you mean 'proof' (noun) instead of prove (verb)?
Suggestion: proof
...do the advantages of being multilingual prove the significance of development, but al...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 309.0 242.827586207 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5857605178 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22538955741 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614886731392 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 379.143842365 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.2683460886 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.833333333 104.977214359 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189059516597 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667833776061 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531872305651 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105159574708 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534509273209 0.0609392437508 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.