Recently, the phenomenon of the National happiness index and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many the matter of the economic growth is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the higher performance of national happiness can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, national happiness can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that no stressful lifestyle as well as providing more opportunities are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered having a natural environment increased the enjoyment of life. Thus, the beneficial ramification of development and advancement apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of development, a strong economy might increase the consequences of being an advanced country. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of economic growth relate to this reality that the demerits of seeking a happier life pertain to working overtime. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of having a developed country are correlated negatively with less happy time in life. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the lower performance of the economy increase.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of national happiness far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of happiness measurements prove the significance of having higher performance, but also pinpoint some development nation’s implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. From the social standpoint, national hap...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd advancement apparently can be seen. Within the realm of development, a stron...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r performance of the economy increase. To conclude, while there are several com...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6618705036 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29572577667 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63309352518 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.223248529 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.166666667 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292356913421 0.242375264174 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937574999132 0.0925447433944 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768590539041 0.071462118173 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169766941178 0.151781067708 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073734236114 0.0609392437508 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.74 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.