Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects. discuss it.

Essay topics:

Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects. discuss it.

It is a highly debatable issue that learning a new language is beneficial or not. Some people believe that it is good for overall growth while some opine that it is not advisable. This essay is going to discuss both the positive and negative factors before reaching a conclusion.

There are myriad benefits of learning a new language at an early stage. To begin with, the positive part, when it comes to picking up a new language, a child is nimble, adepts and competent to accept the different vocabulary, pronunciation and accent of the language. Further, they practice the new language without bothering and being shy and fearlessly and eventually they got the control over the language which benefits them in many ways.

However, There are also negative points exist with above positive points. First of all, learning a new language is slow down the overall growth which not only affects their communication skills but other skills. Children are felt that they are under certain burden due to this. Hence, it is apparent that many academics are against the child exposure to learning more language.

To sum up with this, in the view of the above arguments, one can conclude that despite drawbacks the benefits of learning a new language in early childhood are indeed too great to ignore.

Votes
Average: 7.2 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ildhood are indeed too great to ignore.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, while, first of all, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 1207.87684729 90% => OK
No of words: 219.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9497716895 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5572406993 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 139.433497537 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584474885845 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 379.143842365 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4421794607 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5454545455 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27081450797 0.242375264174 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964311512936 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636259277717 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149926449583 0.151781067708 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378080612021 0.0609392437508 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 55.0591133005 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.