Logging of the rain forests is serious problem and it may have devastating effects on animals and human life?
Surely there has been no time in the history where the lives of people have more dramatically. A quick reflection on the typical day reveals logging of rain forests has been one of the most prominent topics in the contemporary discussion. People have always been intrigued to analyze and explain whether it has negative effects on animals and human life or not. I will elaborate this notion in the further paragraphs.
To begin with, there are myriad troubles of deforestation. The first and foremost, due to reduction of rain forests a lot of ailments are spreading all over the globe. Moreover, it also causes the high pollution level which is more harmful for both animal as well as human. As a case in point, in US more masses are died due to this problem.
Moving ahead, because of deforestation it also enhances the chances of natural disasters which create a lot of troubles on earth. Furthermore, it disturbs the natural environmental cycle therefore, people have to face plethora huddles. Last but not the least, scientists research shows that if the trees are rooted off vigorously it will severely affect the existence of mankind on earth.
In the nutshell, According to above analysis, it can be concluded that deforestation is very dangerous for human and animals. It can be predicted that in the near future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 256, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...l which is more harmful for both animal as well as human. As a case in point, in US more m...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 1207.87684729 91% => OK
No of words: 224.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92857142857 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79462859421 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620535714286 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5848303316 50.4703680194 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9230769231 104.977214359 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2307692308 20.9669160288 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214216820859 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562141663535 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666113021127 0.071462118173 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101963351915 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823751756687 0.0609392437508 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 12.6369458128 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.