Many companies involve employees in decision-making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of using employee’s new idea and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that involving different people in decision making policy is highly rewarding, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am highly inclined to believe that using fresh idea could be beneficial and this essay will examine this theory by providing some academic evidence before concluding.
From an economic standpoint, using employees’ consultant could provide a company with some noticeable profitable effects which are rooted in the fact that feeling as a part of the group as well as staff’s productivity. Not to mention that most of the experts are more knowledgeable about the ins and outs of the company, and as a result, could share some valuable ideas which managers never think about them. According to an academic survey conducted by Tehran university in 2015, employees who paid by the company for their tuition fee are becoming a valuable asset for that company, which 38% of them will become a leader in the future.
On the other hand, some opponents argued that employee’s participating in the process of marketing management may have some negative consequences. They use a valid logic to support that involving staffs in every aspect of company management could lead to chaos in that organization according to this fact that it may get poisoned by personal benefit. From my own experience in RighTel telecommunication company, 28% of managers are not willing to using their staff’s idea in their business plan due to preventing its detrimental side effects.
To recapitulate I pen down saying that, while there is some compelling argument on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefit of asking employee’s innovative thoughts is far beneficial.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, well, while, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 5.94088669951 252% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39464882943 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18746819091 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612040133779 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.0750661375 50.4703680194 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.3 104.977214359 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.9 20.9669160288 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176075212701 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665168766436 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367343188688 0.071462118173 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963023038512 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324014938129 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.