Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of company. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of employees' engagement in decision making and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of employees' involvement is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that participation in decision making can be extremely profitable for well-established companies and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
Form the social standpoint, engaging employees in decision making can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that high-motivated workers as well as job satisfaction, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the more engagement in team-working and decision making the better productivity and output observed. Thus, the beneficial consequences of motivation and satisfaction apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of organization, employees' involvement might increase the consequences of corruption. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of lawbreaking in enterprises related to this reality that the demerit of corruption pertains to bribery. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of less team-working and less participation is correlated negatively with bankrupt companies. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived the notion of taking employee suggestion to avoid corruption.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of taking employees' ideas to make the decisions far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of high productivity prove the significance of team-working, but also pinpoint reduction of organizational corruption.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted workers as well as job satisfaction, are inextricably bound up. According to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 5.75862068966 330% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.98561151079 5.00649968141 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.54167335196 2.71678728327 130% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625899280576 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4281852853 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.666666667 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189637236118 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610240671447 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442099574472 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106980527383 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527477066771 0.0609392437508 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.76 11.5310837438 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.91 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.