The importance of involving employees in decision making policy, which was always debatable has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of involving employees has sparked this controversy over the potential impact on the progression of the company in recent years. It can be said that the employees should be involved in decision making policy, however, some people claim otherwise. This essay will elaborate how involving the employees will help the management make policies effectively and also how it can be a hindrance to its growth and will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reason why companies should involve the employees in the decision-making process, but the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that they are the workforce and have operational experience that the board or management has. Moreover, they can let the board members know the problems facing in the operations so that effective policies to overcome them can be framed. For example, in India, many public limited companies issue voting rights for crucial tasks. Involving the employees in the decision-making process can play a vital role in helping the company progress.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawback and can overwhelm the potential impact of involving the employees. The most alarming one stems from the fact that there are thousands of employees in the workforce and involving each and every one can be a tedious process. Moreover, not all are experienced in managing a company, hence sorting out the inputs of valuable employees can be a time-consuming process. Involving the employees can, therefore, also play a vital role in hindering the progression of the company.
From what has been discussed above, one can conclude that involving the employees is prominent, although the way it hinders the growth should be well handled.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: EACH_AND_EVERY[1]
Message: Consider using 'each one'.
Suggestion: each one
...mployees in the workforce and involving each and every one can be a tedious process. Moreover, not...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ders the growth should be well handled.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 6.10837438424 262% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32996632997 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95775100215 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525252525253 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 482.4 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9333085609 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.769230769 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306228873374 0.242375264174 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128494895354 0.0925447433944 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799601320837 0.071462118173 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180332695792 0.151781067708 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0868087601526 0.0609392437508 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.