Information revolution has changed the way of mass communication and had some negative effects on individual lives as well on society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The effect of the Information revolution changing the way of mass communication, which was always debatable has now become more controversial. The impact of mass communication has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on individual lives and society in recent years. It can be said that mass communication is a boon to the people, however, some people claim otherwise. This essay will elaborate how mass communication helps to unite people and how has killed productivity amongst youngsters and thus will come to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why mass communication has a positive effect on the society, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that, at time of disaster, it can be used to help one another through various social media platforms, news and radio broadcasting. For instance, in the United States, people helped each other by sharing valuable information during hurricane Katrina which helped save thousands of lives. Furthermore, in mass communication, information rapidly spreads to a vast number of audiences.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawback which can overwhelm the benefits of mass communication, but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that it leads to individualism and kills productivity. For instance, youth and students tend to spend more time on the internet, their phones, and television rather than utilizing their time productively. Furthermore, relationship with their family and neighbours is affected. Mass communication can, therefore, play a vital role in creating individualism and killing productivity which is not good for the society or an individual.
From what has been discussed above, one can conclude that the role of mass communication in uniting people is prominent, although the way it creates individualism should not be overlooked.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49134948097 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2568918098 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570934256055 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7278126061 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.25 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222511963532 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826010206715 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581624594737 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137646754362 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056276234043 0.0609392437508 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.