The importance of Information revolution changing the way of mass communication, which was always debatable has now become more controversial. The substantial change in mass media due to information revolution has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on individual lives and society in recent years. It can be agreed that information revolution has some positive impacts, however, some people claim that it can play a destructive role as well. This essay will elaborate how mass communication helps in keeping people informed and how it can create chaos thus will come to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why mass communication has a positive effect on the society, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that information revolution, which has made mass communication available within a fingertip, has helped make individuals and society much more informed about the events that are occurring around every corner of the world. For instance, with the help of smartphone and internet, anyone can surf for any information and seek for expert help from variable sources all within a short period of time, courtesy to the information revolution.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawback which can overwhelm the benefits of mass communication, but the most preponderant one lies in the fact that not only can information revolution create a public opinion based on biased and fake news, but it also can cause chaos in the society by dividing people with the assistance of mass media. As an illustration, xenophobic attitudes towards immigrants are on the rise over the world since the broadcast of negative news has increased in media which has reached ever more people because of the information revolution.
From what has been discussed above, one can conclude that the role of mass communication in keeping people informed is prominent, although the way it can create chaos and divide people should not be overlooked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...rom variable sources all within a short period of time, courtesy to the information revolution...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, look, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 5.75862068966 434% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 318.0 242.827586207 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27044025157 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98675265604 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528301886792 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 533.7 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 20.5024630542 171% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.4910154487 50.4703680194 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 186.222222222 104.977214359 177% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.3333333333 20.9669160288 169% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270293857841 0.242375264174 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120301646331 0.0925447433944 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555450865271 0.071462118173 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160585951093 0.151781067708 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712254923224 0.0609392437508 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.1 12.6369458128 167% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.49 53.1260098522 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.9458128079 165% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.3980295567 154% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.