The importance of parent's legal responsibility towards their children's activities, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of parent's legal responsibility has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on their children's actions in recent years. It can be said that parents should be legally responsible for their children's actions. This essay will elaborate how parent's intervention can influence a child's personality and how it can help them cope up with real-life problems and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are a number of reasons why parents should be held legally responsible, but the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that their intervention can heavily influence a child's personality and behavioral development. Moreover, children tend to break the law in absence of their parent's guidance. For instance, children learn profanity from bad elements at school and if the parents do not interfere and punish, they tend to develop bad manners and spread bad influence. Parents, therefore, should be held legally responsible for their children's act.
Another key justification to uphold this notion is that parents fail to set a role model and the children's behavior is a replica of their parent's actions. besides, children with fine upbringing show more courtesy and professional etiquette in coping with real-life problems. Hence it is apparent why many believe that parents should be held legally responsible for their children's act.
In view of the above-mentioned arguments, one can conclude that the role of parents in shaping the children's behavior is instrumental.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74206349206 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.71476687631 2.71678728327 137% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551587301587 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.4104631817 50.4703680194 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.7 104.977214359 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402508947459 0.242375264174 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.204302001667 0.0925447433944 221% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152804076514 0.071462118173 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254515335538 0.151781067708 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100380822196 0.0609392437508 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 12.6369458128 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.