The importance of improved medical care, which was always debatable has now become more controversial. The potential impact of improved medical care has sparked this controversy over the potential impact of this trend on increased life expectancy. It can be said that improved medical care is a blessing, however, some people believe that it is a curse. This essay will elaborate how advanced medical care can play a major role in eradicating diseases and how it can also be a burden to humans and will lead to a conclusion.
At the outset, there are a number of reasons why improved medical care is a blessing, but the most preponderant one lies in the fact that with advancements in medical science, researchers are able to find a cure for newly emerging diseases. Furthermore, it has helped the medical industry in eradicating life-threatening diseases. For example, smallpox and polio have been eradicated from this world due to improved medical care. Advancements in medical care, therefore, can play a vital role in increasing the life expectancy of humans.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks which can overwhelm the benefits of improved medical care nut the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that as life expectancy increases, the world population also increases. Furthermore, as the population increases, a wide variety of problems are caused not only to humans but also to non-human beings. For example, a study found out that 20% increase in China's life expectancy has led to 40% decrease in their GDP. Increased life expectancy due to improved medical care hence can be a curse to the mankind.
From what has been discussed above, one can conclude that the role of improved medical care is prominent in increasing life expectancy, although the way it acts as a curse should not be overlooked.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95699547213 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486666666667 0.580463131201 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 500.4 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6098386883 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.692307692 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365548899575 0.242375264174 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152703086527 0.0925447433944 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730326382225 0.071462118173 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242536556141 0.151781067708 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244752541063 0.0609392437508 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 56.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.