The importance of not including sports and games in secondary school timetable, which was always debatable has now become more controversial. The influence of inclusion of extracurricular activities has sparked the controversy over the impact of this trend on the secondary school timetable. I completely disagree that games should not be included in the timetable as sports and games have a myriad of benefits for the students. This essay will elaborate how playing sports acts as an important learning environment and how it helps the children focus on their studies and thus will come to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are a number of reasons why sports and games should be included in secondary school timetable, but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that it acts as an important learning environment for children. For instance, a study of 200 children showed that they were able to develop various unteachable skills by participating in sports at school. Furthermore, by playing sports, children develop physical skills, learn to be a team member, learn about play fair, improve self-esteem, and so on. Games and sports, therefore, have to be included in secondary school timetable.
Another key justification to support this notion stems from the fact that participating in sports improves blood circulation in the body which makes the kids mentally agile. For example, numerous studies have shown that children who play sports perform better at school. Furthermore, they are able to study well and do mental work better. Hence, Games and sports should be a vital part of their curriculum.
From what has been discussed above, one can conclude that games and sports acts as an important learning environment and the way it helps them focus on their studies should be well handled.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25684931507 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95808548734 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510273972603 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 456.3 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.851347727 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.076923077 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398441185812 0.242375264174 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167021856397 0.0925447433944 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129328873696 0.071462118173 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245535523771 0.151781067708 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931047136915 0.0609392437508 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.