Should heritage buildings be preserved? Discuss your views.
The importance of heritage buildings to be preserved which was always debatable has now become more controversial. The potential impact of preservation has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on heritage buildings in recent years. It can be said that heritage buildings should be preserved at all costs. This essay will elaborate how preserving the heritage building helps us recollect the culture and diversity attached to it and how it helps in boosting the economy and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reason why heritage building should be preserved, but the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that it helps us remember the works of architects of bygone centuries. Furthermore, heritage buildings have a vast history to be talked about and by visiting them, people tend to recollect the culture and diversity attached to it. For instance, the Taj Mahal in India is a perfect example of workmanship of the 16th century. Preserving heritage buildings can play a vital role in remembering the deeprooted culture.
Another key justification to uphold this notion stems from the fact that preserving heritage buildings can help attract tourism. Furthermore, this helps in bringing in foreign currency and helps boost up the local economy and create jobs for the local people. As an illustration, Sydney's local economy is based on tourism as many people from around the world come to visit the Opera house and many other ancient buildings. Preservation of these buildings can, therefore, play a vital role in boosting the local economy through tourism.
From what has been discussed above, one can conclude that preservation of heritage buildings is prominent, and the way it helps in boosting the local economy should not be overlooked.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, so, therefore, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.204778157 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85970983442 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518771331058 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 476.1 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9248119933 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.307692308 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69230769231 7.25397266985 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374607134106 0.242375264174 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15894901488 0.0925447433944 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121801407554 0.071462118173 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266045073314 0.151781067708 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104107018422 0.0609392437508 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 59.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.