The University will deduct students score for late assignments, opinions and solutions
The effect of university deducting students score for late assignments which was always debatable has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of deducting student’s scores has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on late submission in recent years. It can be said that universities should deduct marks for late assignments. This essay will elaborate how deducting scores brings responsibility among students and how teachers should guide their students to submit the assignment on time.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why university deducts marks for late assignments, but the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that it improves the student’s responsibility and punctuality. Furthermore, it brings a fear amongst students by deducting marks for late submission hence making them responsible and punctual. For instance, UNSW in Australia deducts 25% of the final score for late submission hence students tend to mostly be punctual with their assignments.
Approaches to deal with marks being deducted for late assignments are numerous, but the most effective one is that teachers can work closely with their peers by guiding them and checking on regular intervals to submit the assignment on time, which is not impracticable and attainable, but comprehensible and attainable. Furthermore, this may help the struggling students to correct their loopholes. As an illustration, Albert Einstein was able to achieve the Nobel price only because he closely worked with his professors. Universities deducting student’s scores, therefore, can play a vital role in increasing a student’s punctuality.
From what has been discussed above, one can conclude that the impact of deducting scores for late assignments is prominent, and the way teachers helping the students overcome the issue of losing marks should not be overlooked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: PRICE_PRIZE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'Nobel Prize' (reward)?
Suggestion: Nobel Prize
...Albert Einstein was able to achieve the Nobel price only because he closely worked with his...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, look, may, so, therefore, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67482517483 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23279119666 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541958041958 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 484.2 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.859409923 50.4703680194 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.25 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439406574538 0.242375264174 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.19429438862 0.0925447433944 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102261662153 0.071462118173 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296453811817 0.151781067708 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128009070729 0.0609392437508 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.