Should university penalize students for late submission of their work.
The effect of universities penalizing students for late submission of their work which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of penalizing has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on late submission in recent years. It can be said that universities should penalize for late assignments, however, some people claim that penalizing for late submission is incorrect. This essay will elaborate how penalizing students for late submission brings responsibility and punctuality and how penalties for late submission increases anxiety and induces stress among students.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why universities penalize students for late submission of their work, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that it brings responsibility and punctuality among the students. Furthermore, it brings a fear amongst students by deducting marks for late submission hence making them responsible and punctual. For instance, UNSW in Australia deducts 25% of the final score for late submission hence students tend to mostly be punctual with their assignments.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks, which can certainly overwhelm the potential impact of universities penalizing students for late submission, but the most alarming one lies in the fact that it induces stress and anxiety. Furthermore, the pressure from deadlines to finish the assignment on time can have a tragic effect on student’s lives. As an illustration, the suicidal death rate caused due to stress amongst college students have increased to 20% after the introduction of penalties for late submission. Universities penalizing students for late submission of their work, therefore, can play a vital role in student’s education.
From what has been discussed above, one can conclude that universities penalizing students for late submission is prominent, although the way universities induce stress and anxiety among students should be well handled.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78260869565 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18762610233 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501672240803 0.580463131201 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 523.8 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4357327959 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.083333333 104.977214359 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.670312547813 0.242375264174 277% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.306044734676 0.0925447433944 331% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154264102414 0.071462118173 216% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.469811478019 0.151781067708 310% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.095237371158 0.0609392437508 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 12.6369458128 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.