Should university penalize students for late submission of their work

Essay topics:

Should university penalize students for late submission of their work?

The importance of the topic university penalize students for late submission of their work, which has always been debatable has now upsurged a lots of arguments in favor and against it, thus it has become even more controversial. The substantial influence of imitating celebrities has sparked controversy over the potential of this trends is an integral part of the society in recent years. It can be agreed that the upside of imitating celebrities are instrumental indeed, however it has some various drawbacks as well. This essay will be elaborate on both assertions and provide a well-weighted conclusion.

At the outset, there are numerous reasons why the university penalize students for late submission of their work is unreservedly salient, but the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that advantage. Therefore, it is vital time to appreciate both the significance of the university penalize students for late submission of their works overall amelioration of society.

However, it has some people who choose to think differently and hold an opposing viewpoint, which can certainly overwhelm substantial influence on the university penalize students for late submission of their work? Nevertheless, the contradiction is rooted in the fact that disadvantage. Hence, it is apparent that the downside of the university penalize students for late submission of their work cannot be ignored.

The above-presented dissertation illustrates both perspectives about the impact of the university penalize students for late submission of their work. While it is evident it has some various benefits, although its deleterious effect cannot be ignored.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
... always been debatable has now upsurged a lots of arguments in favor and against it, t...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 328, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...arked controversy over the potential of this trends is an integral part of the socie...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55335968379 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2151082984 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 139.433497537 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529644268775 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.0 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1607247659 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.727272727 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 7.25397266985 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.599077630527 0.242375264174 247% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.25451085809 0.0925447433944 275% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.237635370865 0.071462118173 333% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.426288647013 0.151781067708 281% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147717424544 0.0609392437508 242% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.