International organizations are trying to solve lots of problems these days. Which problem do you think needs more attention and what are the ways to combat that problem?
The importance of International organizations trying to solve lots of problems, which was always debatable has now become more controversial. The impact of international organisations has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on solving a myriad of issues. It can be said that the major problem that needs attention is sustainable development. This essay will elaborate how organizations are harming the environment followed by solutions to curb this issue and thus, will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are a number of reasons why International organizations should address the issue of sustainability, but the most preponderant one arises from the fact that they consuming a humongous amount of natural resources to manufacture their products. For example, paper manufacturing companies need to cut down three trees to manufacture a bundle of A-4 sheets. Furthermore, this can lead to depletion of natural resources causing an imbalance in the natural habitat of all living organisms. Addressing sustainability, therefore, needs the most attention.
Approaches to deal with combating the hindrance of sustainable development are numerous, but the most effective one stems from the fact that International organizations can work ethically by planting more trees, building dams and preserving the natural habitat of flora and fauna thus leading to decrease in deforestation which is not impracticable and unattainable, but comprehensible and feasible. For instance, a study has shown that areas companies that have combated the problem has helped in preserving the biodiversity.
From what has been discussed above, one can conclude that paying attention to problems like sustainability is prominent, and the way it helps preserving the biodiversity should not be overlooked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to preserve' or 'preserve'.
Suggestion: to preserve; preserve
...lity is prominent, and the way it helps preserving the biodiversity should not be overlook...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, look, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68248175182 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44361777543 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587591240876 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 89.8547036531 50.4703680194 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.545454545 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9090909091 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250742157355 0.242375264174 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894864350896 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730164833414 0.071462118173 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145854719815 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667294235382 0.0609392437508 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.