The importance of euthanasia no longer being accepted in modern society which was always debatable has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of euthanasia has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on modern society in recent years. It can be said that mercy killing cannot be accepted in the modern society, however, some people claim otherwise and hold an opponent’s view. This essay will elaborate how religious and cultural belief systems forbid mercy-killing and how accepting euthanasia will help the health industry and will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reason why euthanasia is no longer accepted into modern society but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that religious and cultural belief systems forbid mercy-killing. Furthermore, it can be argued that deciding the fate of a terminally ill patient is ethically incorrect even if it is done voluntarily. For instance, religious countries like India believe that euthanasia is immoral and illegal.
Approaches to deal with euthanasia not being accepted by modern society are numerous, but the most effective one is by creating awareness of the benefits of euthanasia as painless death can help health industry and tax-payers. Furthermore, permanently brain damaged disabled, who will be in a coma forever, cost a fortune on health systems. The government can form policies to legalize euthanasia which can play a crucial role in the sustenance of health industry.
From what has been discussed above, one can conclude that the impact of Euthanasia, which is longer accepted in the modern society is prominent, although the way it helps in the sustenance of health industry should be well handled.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38768115942 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96334065519 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557971014493 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.4332677471 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.181818182 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 7.25397266985 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33626066859 0.242375264174 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125014095748 0.0925447433944 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925803530803 0.071462118173 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208337092645 0.151781067708 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679639001627 0.0609392437508 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.