The effect of improved medical care, which was always debatable has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of advanced medical care has sparked the potential impact of this trend on increased life expectancy. It can be said that it is a boon to humanity, while some people claim otherwise. This essay will elaborate how longer life expectancy can help provide the society with the abundance of experience possessed by old people and how it can lead to unemployment and this will lead to a logical explanation.
At the outset, there are a number of ways in which improved life expectancy can be a boon to the society, but the most preponderant one lies in the fact that longevity allows people to contribute more to the world with their talent and wisdom. For example, most of the radical inventions and discoveries in modern science are triumphed by scientists in their old age, thanks to improved medical care. Furthermore, lawyers, bankers, researchers, politician and many other professionals have a vast experience and can contribute more when compared to the youngsters in their respective fields.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks, which can certainly overwhelm the potential impact of increased life expectancy, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that it can lead to unemployment. For instance, when people live longer, there will be more people who refuse to retire at an early age. This will lead to unemployment for the young generation. Furthermore, many fresh graduates will not be able to get a job only because experienced old people will hold those positions.
From what has been discussed above, one can conclude that the role of increased life expectancy in contributing to the society is prominent, although the way it leads to unemployment should be well handled.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, well, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 6.10837438424 246% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19594594595 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03295600577 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533783783784 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 483.3 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6981449641 50.4703680194 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.166666667 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.25397266985 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257546218524 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955913011184 0.0925447433944 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546351957375 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157452933127 0.151781067708 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062028202192 0.0609392437508 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.