In towns and cities, large shopping malls should replace the small local shop. Do you agree or disagree?
The effect of large shopping malls replacing the small local shops which were always debatable has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of large shopping malls has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on small local shops in recent years. It can be said that shopping malls should replace the local shops, however, some people claim that malls should not replace the small shops. This essay will elaborate how shopping malls save our time, and also how it kills the local economy and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why large shopping malls should replace local shops, but the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that large shopping malls save our time. Furthermore, they have a variety of stores for one to buy all their daily needs from under one roof. For instance, Westfield in Australia has a wide variety of stores for shopping groceries, clothes, shoes etc. Large shopping malls, therefore, can play a vital role in replacing small shops.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks, which can certainly overwhelm the potential impact of large malls replacing small local shops, but the most alarming one stems from the fact that it kills the local economy. Furthermore, large shopping malls take away the bread out of the mouths of many small shop owners. As an illustration, not many people living in the urban areas tend to shop at the local shops nowadays due to the on growing mall culture, therefore can play a vital role in large shopping malls killing the local economy.
From what has been discussed above, one can conclude that the impact of large shopping malls replacing local shops is prominent, although the way it kills the local economy should be well handled.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a vital role in replacing small shops. Nevertheless, there remain some drawback...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41050132978 2.71678728327 89% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484949832776 0.580463131201 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.9 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4502169656 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.583333333 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.488940235097 0.242375264174 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.238133946183 0.0925447433944 257% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115086542821 0.071462118173 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.359888203171 0.151781067708 237% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638660759282 0.0609392437508 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.1260098522 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.32886699507 92% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 55.0591133005 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.