The effect of people spending too much time at work, which was always debatable has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of employees working long hours has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on their personal life. It can be said that long working hours have an adverse effect on an employee’s personal life. This essay will elaborate what makes people work longer and the positive effects of creating a work-life balance and thus will come to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are a number reasons why people spend too much time at work, but the most preponderant one lies in the fact that employees have job insecurities. For example, a study indicates that people who spend less time at the office are often unlikely to get promoted. Furthermore, with robots and artificial intelligence ready to take over the human workforce, it has added an enormous amount of pressure on the employees to perform at optimum levels to and to stay ahead in the race.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that people should have a balance between work and their personal life. This is mainly because working long hours can not only lead to affecting the health of an employee but also could be a hindrance to his personal life. Therefore, a good work/life balance can enable employees to feel more in control of their working life and lead to increased productivity, a happier married life, improvements in employee health and well-being.
From what has been discussed above, one can conclude that working extra hours is prominent to secure their position at the company, although creating a work-life balance should not be overlooked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 522, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thus will come to a logical conclusion. At the outset, there are a number reason...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05244755245 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76276218798 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552447552448 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.5776881224 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.363636364 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389782517516 0.242375264174 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162398176068 0.0925447433944 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085203412707 0.071462118173 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235238841643 0.151781067708 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597695789704 0.0609392437508 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.