Mass media like TV, newspaper and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion?
In this day and age, the issue of mass media and its corresponding influence has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many, a substantial number of people hold true the idea that TV, newspapers and radio can form the society, which I opt to vigorously support. Provided with statistics and scientific research, this will be analyzed throughout the following essay before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.
For one, it is commonly accepted that in this digital revolution era, channels of communications such as broadband internet access, editorials as well as print media open up avenues for culture exchange. To put this idea forward, journalists in University of Washington undertook a study to investigate the link between the media type and people’s culture. It has been revealed that those who watch TV on a daily basis positively correlates with their tendency to spread their culture and lifestyle. Hence, beneficial ramifications of such an idea can be seen with clarity.
In addition to this, mass media is considered as a major source of information, and this can make contributions to mold people’s minds by broadcasting pre-selected contents. According to my experience, Harvard university researchers conducted an experiment on two different audience groups. They concluded that people listening to a larger number of radio stations are two times less likely to believe political propaganda. In this regard, media bias, invasion of privacy and identity theft should be taken into account. Therefore, this example fortifies the argument that mass media can shape the society.
To recapitulate, after analyzing the effects of mass media on the society as a means of culture exchange and information source, it is felt that people’s thinking can fall under influence of mass media.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, therefore, well, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09016251026 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1872617753 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.384615385 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.25397266985 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154570206019 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541923020374 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052355742461 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105989025614 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511185494502 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.