Over the last few decades, with the oneset end extensive use of the Internet, the way people are used to communicate with each other has changed dramatically. Despite widely supported opinion that due to these changes the amount of hamble communications even between friends has essentially reduced, this essay will prove that it has mostly positive impact on society.
To begin with, the main factor contributing to the advantages is the possibility to commute with anyone all over the world using only mobile phone or laptop. The borders have fall for many who used to spend days and even monthes on paper post conversations. Not to mention groundline phones, requiring the special operators to link with another city or country. For instance, people from Canada nowadays may easily connect with their relatives from Australia, which could be unbelievable and impossible just a couple decades ago.
However, with the tremedious developing in the communications means people paradoxically have faced problem in warm and humble communications. Compering to the past, having the opportunity to get through your relatives and friends, majority of people tend to ignore it. For example, some of Australian social researches reviel that due to today's hectic lifestyle, about 75% of Australians frequently do not answer a phone call when they are not in the mood or it is not convenient enough, whereas we had no choice 40 years ago because we had not even seen the name of caller.
In conclusion, in spite of the fact that drastically changing ways and methods of communicating could negatively impact on our relations with people, I firmly believe, that giving technological progress and incredible development in the means of communications sphere is definitely more advantageous.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27464788732 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01039658545 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 139.433497537 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672535211268 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.8443984869 50.4703680194 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.8 104.977214359 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4 20.9669160288 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3 7.25397266985 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199581120586 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666259851544 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716713657037 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124586229025 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891635582311 0.0609392437508 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 53.1260098522 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.