These days, with the growing demand for specialists in the job market all over the world, the question of proper candidates recruiting has become a subject of considerable debates. While some companies tend to hire people based purely on their academic degree, others pay more attention to personality and ability to work in team. This essay will analyse the topic from different sides and show that personality skills, as well as the ability to be a team player, are more important than any academic qualification.
To begin with, the personality skills, also known as soft skills, such as communication, self-responsibility and attitude are remarkable for the complexity to train and develop. This in particular makes the skills more valuable and desirable comparing to hard skills, which an academic degree is mostly about. For example, the latest research performed by the Institute of Career Development in Australia shows that candidates with good personality skills have about 40% higher chance to get a job in world known companies, like Google, Microsoft or Apple.
Another pivotal point to mention is that being a good team player usually brings more value to a company by synergizing skills of other team members and pushing the combined efforts for achieving better results. Another interesting research from an independent journalist performed for the Association of Head Recruiters in Australia reports that companies primarily seeking for candidates with good ability of team work tend to show about 5% to 8% higher annual grows.
Finally, despite the obvious importance of an academic qualification to fulfil a role in a company, I firmly believe that soft skills, including personality and ability to work with others, are usually more beneficial for company and bring better value.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, well, while, for example, in particular, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34736842105 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91904941585 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582456140351 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.5024630542 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.2383574567 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.333333333 104.977214359 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6666666667 20.9669160288 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8888888889 7.25397266985 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298432857557 0.242375264174 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127262935204 0.0925447433944 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575969064288 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196628774453 0.151781067708 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482774362854 0.0609392437508 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 12.6369458128 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.3980295567 138% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.5123152709 190% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.