When recruiting new staff, is it more important for a company to look at a candidate’s academic qualifications or his/her personality and ability to work with others? Support your opinion with appropriate reasons and examples.
This days, with the growing demand for specialists in the job market all over the world, the question of proper candidates recruiting has become a subject of considerable debates. While some companies tend to hire people based purely on their academic degree, others pay more attention to the personality and ability work in team. This essay will analyse the topic from different sides and show that personality skills, as well ale the ability to be a team player, are mor important than any academic qualification.
To begin with, the personality skills, also known as soft kills, such as communication, self-responsibility and attitude are remarkable for the complexity to train and develop. On the contrary, an academic qualification usually targets development of hard skills, which include knowledge in certain areas and good level of practical experience. For example, the latest research performed by the Institute of Career Development in Australia shows that candidates with good personality skills have about 40% higher chance to get a job in world known companies, like Google, Microsoft or Apple.
Another pivotal point to mention is that being a a good team player usually brings more value to a company by synergizing skills of other team members and pushing the combined efforts for achieving better results. Another interesting research by an independent journalists taken for the Association of Head Recruiters in Australia reports that companies primarily seeking for candidates with good ability of team work tend to show about 55 to 85 higher annual grows.
Finally, despite the obvious importance of the proper academic qualification to properly fulfil a role in a company or certain team, I firmly believe that soft skills, which include personality and ability to work in team, are usually more beneficial for company and bring better value.
Comments
In the contemporary context,…
In the contemporary context, the search for capable specialists can be an exceptionally challenging endeavor. Hence, entrepreneurs are progressively turning to recruitment agencies for solutions. Among these agencies, one distinguishes itself with an extraordinarily broad spectrum of experts spanning various fields. Their success relies solely on the proficiency and insight of their specialists, assuring each customer of exceptional outcomes, more info.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
This days, with the growing demand for speci...
^^^^
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: a
... pivotal point to mention is that being a a good team player usually brings more va...
^^^
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... pivotal point to mention is that being a a good team player usually brings more ...
^
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: a; a
... pivotal point to mention is that being a a good team player usually brings more va...
^^^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'journalist'?
Suggestion: journalist
... interesting research by an independent journalists taken for the Association of Head Recru...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, well, while, for example, such as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 20.9802955665 43% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35254237288 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95692721552 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572881355932 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.5024630542 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.3780396167 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.444444444 104.977214359 167% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.7777777778 20.9669160288 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.77777777778 7.25397266985 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277548471446 0.242375264174 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117509394531 0.0925447433944 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469535434128 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176408264441 0.151781067708 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330938138231 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 12.6369458128 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 10.9458128079 155% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.3980295567 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.