Media make people lose contact with real life, do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of losing contact with real-life by media and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of telecommunication is highly beneficial, this issue is regarded as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that face-to-face contact can be a plus, and I will analyze both views throughout my essay.
From a social standpoint, using different kinds of media can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of easy contacts, as well as communication with people across the world, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, I can easily contact my sister who lives on another continent by phone, also send my emails to my employer in China. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both send and receive the latest information can apparently be seen in our real life.
On the other hand, within the realm of psychology, spending colossal time on media might increase the consequences of isolation. As an example, new research undertaken by UCLA University shows that 75% of mental problems for those who prefer to stop their contacts are correlated negatively with continuous use of media. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of influencing by media could relate to this reality that the demerits of propagation of fake news pertain to unreliable websites on the Internet. As a result, users have illusory views about real-life.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the balancing between the use of media and retaining face-to-face contact is so vital to maintaining real life. Not only do the advantages of accessible contacts prove the significance of real communication, but also pinpoint connections with people in different locations implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-02 | Behnaz fallah | 88 | view |
| 2020-09-01 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
- There are more negative impacts than the benefits of people using mobile devices Do you agree 88
- There are numerous after class activities for students Is it good or not 88
- If Voting is compulsory in a democratic society what conclusions can we draw about Nature of democracy 85
- Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work but some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience such as international travel and volunteering Discuss with examples or cases 80
- There are numerous after class activities for students Is it good or not 94
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 31.9359605911 166% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33779264214 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16270916715 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632107023411 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6596052027 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293378408236 0.242375264174 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100798499968 0.0925447433944 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836895880298 0.071462118173 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1744736927 0.151781067708 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465251816944 0.0609392437508 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.