Medical technology can increase the humans life expectancy. Is it blessing or curse?
In recent years, development in medical technology is increasing life expectancy of humans was always a debatable topic. Many individuals consider this as a curse to mankind as it brings more problems than benefits. Others reject this notion and argue it is the greatest achievement. In my opinion, advancements in medical field creates many disputes among families. This essay would further elaborate both the sides with necessary evidence and finally leading to a appropriate conclusion.
To begin with, no one deny the fact that due to development in medical science has increased the life expectancy of people. A recent survey conducted by University of California shows that average death of person has increased from 46.7 in 1990 to 59.4 in 2016. The above data clearly shows that humans are making health-related decisions and this achievement can be attributed to improvement in public health and medical care. For example, new invention in medical field had found solutions to many dreadful diseases such as cancer, HIV and many.
However, there are many pitfalls with the improvement in life expectancy, old people are living more and more due to that there is an increase in financial burden on families like regular health checkups and daily visits to hospital. It's good that one can stay with family for long years but financial burden can cause conflict within the family. In addition, living long life means a less working force for the country in terms of prosperity and less growth. Further, it causes increasing in population and creates so many problems like poverty, the lack of basic facilities and many more problems.
To conclude, advancements in medical technology creates disadvantages rather than creating advantages for future life. In a nutshell, it can be concluded that an increase in average life expectancy rate can put up the burden on environment and society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 465, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...cessary evidence and finally leading to a appropriate conclusion. To begin wit...
^
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...c health and medical care. For example, new invention in medical field had found solutions to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, so, for example, in addition, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 306.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22549019608 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81749574704 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575163398693 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7903368956 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.6 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321316291746 0.242375264174 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938026315344 0.0925447433944 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078812165894 0.071462118173 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190934831828 0.151781067708 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438329114387 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.