Medical technology can increase life expectancy. How much do you agree?
It is an irrefutable fact that medical technology has become an integral and indispensable part of an individual's life. While proponents are considering it as the greatest achievement, opponents are making their belief totally opposite to it. I firmly believe that it has a plethora of merits with some demerits. I will elaborate on my views in the forthcoming paragraphs and lead to a plausible conclusion.
To begin with, medical technology has many benefits to us along with our society. First and foremost, the positive aspect of this bias has been that it makes the way of life more productive and assists in increasing life expectancy. Without tremendous advancements of medical technology, we could not be able to expect such unprecedented achievements in our life or society. For instance, a search stated that with the help of medical technology, life expectancy has increased from 40% to 57.1%. Thus, it can be said that medical technology plays a vital role in increasing life expectancy.
On the contrary like, “Every rose has its thorns,” it has some disadvantages as well. To cite an example, it increases the population of the nation as we are the part of such country where resources are limited. So more population leads to poverty due to the lack of basic facilities. Owing to this, increasing life expectancy has become the biggest threat. Thus, this example clearly shows that it has various negative impacts to our lives along with our society.
In conclusion, after inspection upon further paragraphs, we concede that its benefits hold more water instead of its negative externalities. As a result, medical technology should promote in a wide range without any trouble.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...n integral and indispensable part of an individuals life. While proponents are considering ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ry like, 'Every rose has its thorns,' it has some disadvantages as well. To ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 20.9802955665 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17689530686 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0542967082 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574007220217 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.6569160998 50.4703680194 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.625 104.977214359 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3125 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23817171303 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768043945554 0.0925447433944 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927776311644 0.071462118173 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125241508607 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104974373749 0.0609392437508 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 12.6369458128 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.