Medical technology can increase life expectancy. Is it a blessing or curse?
There have been an advancement of technology in many fields. Medical is one of those fields and as result people can live longer. There is a difference of opinion among people that whether it is blessing or a curse. This essay will discuss how technology in medical life is a blessing.
To begin with, the latest developments in the medical technology has improved the quality of life. With the help of technology humans can get rid of the complicated diseases easily and live their life peacefully. For instance, nowadays kidney stones can be removed easily by laser technology without the need of doing of surgical operations, which has a probability of developing complication while operating. Therefore, technology has raised the standard of life of people.
Secondly, increased life expectancy of the renowned people can be beneficial for mankind. Medical technology can also help in saving life of the famous people which gives them a chance to live their life longer and help people by serving them. For example, Stephen Hawking a famous scientist, who we could have lost very early due to his complex nature of disease but due to the advancement in the medical technology he lived longer and proved to be a gem for the humanity. Thus, higher life expectancy can be fruitful.
In conclusion, the medical technology can improve the quality of the human life and at the same time save precious lives of people. In my opinion, the medical technology has made it possible for human to live longer and this is beneficial for all of us.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1286.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92720306513 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73288334372 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524904214559 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 426.6 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7184785198 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8571428571 104.977214359 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.25397266985 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417366465443 0.242375264174 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161333485295 0.0925447433944 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070617735559 0.071462118173 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259933095057 0.151781067708 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355502813492 0.0609392437508 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 12.6369458128 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.