Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies discussing the influence of medical advacement on human life. Some peope think that the advancement in medical technology has no impact on average human life expectancy, while others maintain that development in medicine has greatly influenced and enhanced average human life. This essay will discuss the pros of advancement in medicine followed by its post effects on increase in human life.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments associated with the enhancement in medical technology. Firstly, the most conspicuous is that the development in medical field has resulted in the cure of many deadly diseases. For instance, diseases like tuberculosis, High fever, Malaria and Cholera which were the deadliest diseases of their time, can now be easily cured with the advancement in medicine. As a result, it is quite evident that advancement in medical technology has not only proved as cure for various fatal diseases but also resulted in enhancement of human life.
To further underscore, another pivotal facet of this argument that proponents are not cognizant are the goodies bestowed by medicine. Henceforth, horrible and lethal diseases of early times, for example, black fevert responsible for the death of numerous children can now be easily cured and subsequently save the child from the deathbed. As a result, the marvels of medical technology to enahance average life expectancy cannot be overruled.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that advancement in medical technology has ensued in cure from deadly diseases and consequently augmented towards enhancement of average human life expectancy.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, so, while, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53076923077 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93838098963 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.0 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1996435691 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.727272727 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.18181818182 7.25397266985 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252778980015 0.242375264174 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10207777501 0.0925447433944 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673788505185 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164041304653 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378783210606 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.